Jake Gyllenhaal:
Hmm, I'm conflicted. I don't like his acting whatsoever, I've pretty much hated him in everything I've seen, except Prince of Persia. That's why I'm conflicted. The 'Bourne' films need a good dramatic actor ala Matt Damon. We need to see his confusion, his desperation. BUT, Bourne may not even be the main character. The sequel has only promised to be in the same world as Jason Bourne. So maybe Gyllenhaal could pull it off?
Tobey Maguire:
![]() |
| He could totally be Gyllenhaal's twin |
Garrett Hedlund:
Why? Why am I even writing about this guy? He totally stunk up the screen in Tron: Legacy and I hated every aspect of his acting in that film. Why would I want to see him replace one of the greatest actors of my generation (Damon) in one of the most critically acclaimed action trilogies in history? The answer is I don't want to see him get the role, period.
It's my opinion, you're on my blog so you obviously care, or you're just curious. Feel free to drink some Haterade in the comments. Who of these three should get the role? Or maybe it's not any of these three, what do you think?
Click the jump for a little extra. (SOILER ALERT TO BOURNE ULTIMATUM)
You know who they should bring back, Édgar Ramírez! His character of Paz in The Bourne Ultimatum was incredible! He demanded our attention on the screen and held is own against Damon. SPOILER ALERT: Jason Bourne doesn't kill Paz in the film, he spares his life. So why not continue the franchise with a revenge-filled Paz seeking to clear his name and start a new life? The producers can leave the door open for Damon to return to the franchise, and fulfill their wish of staying within the confines of the 'Bourne' world. What do you think?




